Search for: "USA v. Michael Mays"
Results 81 - 100
of 613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
(See Part I here, Part II here, Part III here, Part IV here, and Part V here.)The reason for its inability is that both the Constitution (Art. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
(See Part I here, Part II here, Part III here, Part IV here, and Part V here.)The reason for its inability is that both the Constitution (Art. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
” Sanofi made the point that “ongoing” is not “permanent,” and that trial participants who had ongoing alopecia may have had their hair grow back. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 5:17 pm
The Company The above-described scenario played out in a lawsuit captioned Magarik v Kraus USA, Inc. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
The judgment directly concerns the legality of standard contractual clauses in the context of transfers of personal data to the USA. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
On May 12, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 9:00 pm
Piselli v. 75th St. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
Christopher Smith, Plaintiff, represented by Ramona Veronica Ladwig, Kazerouni Law Group, Anthony Patrick Chester, Hyde & Swigart & Seyed Abbas Kazerounian, Kazerouni Law Group APC.Moss Law Firm PC, Defendant, represented by Rebecca Anne Moss, Moss Law Firm PC & Michael Allen Moss, Moss Law Firm PC.MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERSIDNEY A. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
Serova v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
” At his eponymous blog, Michael Dorf questions the assumption behind a much-quoted question asked by Roberts during oral argument last week in Babb v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:53 am
” In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Michael Helfand weighs in on Espinoza v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
In his congressional testimony, Inspector General Michael Horowitz described his report as “the product of a comprehensive and exhaustive review” (C-SPAN at 57:07; see also, e.g., C-SPAN at 2:55:10, 2:56:20). [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Return on investment arguments may eventually be fine-grained and precise enough to justify spending government money on civil justice INSTEAD of spending it on something else. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
Michael Geist comments. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
” In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Michael McGough weighs in on last week’s oral argument in Kansas v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm
Wednesday, November 6, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.: The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on reauthorizing the USA Freedom Act of 2015. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 12:23 pm
(The firm is Mazars USA; it takes no position in the legal fight over Trump’s records.) [read post]
