Search for: "United States v. Covington" Results 81 - 100 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm by Mary Whisner
Washington: Covington & Burling, 1976 Omnibus Copyright Revision Legislative History 17 v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:18 am by Ronald Mann
  Although the text pretty strongly favors Roche, Stanford and the United States (as amicus) presented a strong policy case for public ownership of publicly funded inventions. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, seeking a preliminary injunction against an ordinance regulating sexually oriented businesses on the ground that the ordinance violated Plaintiffs-Appellants' First Amendment and Due Process rights. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-7806. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:56 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The basic question in the case is whether the United States government (here the USPS) counts as “a person who is not the owner of a patent. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
Bailey     Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 09a0022p.06  Dennis Pennington v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
Bailey     Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 09a0022p.06  Dennis Pennington v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
United States, next term’s case stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey that asks whether a public official defrauds the government of its property when she provides a public-policy reason for an official decision that is not her actual reason, “a conflux of fascinating law and facts. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:54 am by David G. Badertscher
Senator Says Re-banning Animal Crush Videos 'A Virtual Certainty' A speedy Senate Judiciary Committee hearing this morning paid notice to animal rights groups that hope to flatten a resurgence of "animal crush" videos, an industry they say has regained ground after the United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark Dombroff of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Supreme Court rules induced infringement requires a 271(a) direct infringer (Limelight v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
Weldon    Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 08a0177n.06 USA v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Bankruptcy Court - Covington 08a0385p.06 Brown, et al v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am by William C. MacLeod
In doing this it will exercise power of a judicial nature….[14] Supporting Covington was a colloquy between two other congressmen, also quoted by the court: Mr. [read post]