Search for: "United States Marine, Inc. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
First, the compatibility of United Kingdom corporate taxation with certain principles of EU law and the liabilities of the Revenue to a taxpayer who has overpaid tax on the basis of incompatible United Kingdom legislation. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 12:48 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Number Word Mark 6171625 GANT COIN 6186820 GRASTON 6185288 ACTIVE CARE 6184959 A&A SURFACES 6184958 A&A SURFACES 6184505 SERENSNIPPITY ORGANIC INSPIRED HAIR SALON 6184477 LEGAL SOLUTIONS, PRACTICAL ADVICE 6184413 MARCH MADNESS 6184187 COMMAND GRILLE 6184171 JAVA WAVE 6184117 LUMALUXE 6183997 ZAAD 6186996 INDY HEMATOLOGY EDUCATION 6186778 RECYCLED WEALTH 6183837 COOL SCIENCE MATTERS 6183734 MARINE 31 6183733 MARINE 31 6186699 ESPERTA 6186975 REAL. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]