Search for: "United States of America v. Cable" Results 81 - 100 of 200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm by Josh Blackman
And the rationale for selecting these countries was based on objective criteria regarding how each nation shares information with the United States—precisely the grounds stated in the March executive order. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
” Because the President’s travel ban is not “bona fide,” the court privileged cable news hits from Rudolph Giuliani and Stephen Miller over official statements of the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State, to conclude that the policy was in fact animated by animus. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
., Verizon’s acquisition of America Online and Yahoo,  AT&T’s acquisition of DirecTV and several mergers of cable television operators. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
., Verizon’s acquisition of America Online and Yahoo,  AT&T’s acquisition of DirecTV and several mergers of cable television operators. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:00 am by Robert Chesney
United States, however, based on a plain-language approach to the statutory phrase “no person. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
  Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
United States Melania Trump has attended a hearing in her libel case against a Maryland blogger apparently to show how serious she is about the case. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
If you email friends abroad, chat with family members overseas, or browse websites hosted outside of the United States, the NSA has almost certainly searched through the contents of your communications — and it has done so without a warrant. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 5:37 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Says her judgment would result in “amnesty for everybody” and “her judgment is so bad that she should never be President of the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm by Cindy Cohn
Each kind of surveillance gives the U.S. government access to vast quantities of Internet communications.[3] Upstream gives the NSA access to communications flowing through the fiber-optic Internet backbone cables within the United States.[4] This happens because the NSA, with the help of telecommunications companies like AT&T, makes wholesale copies of the communications streams passing through certain fiber-optic backbone cables. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Kenneth Anderson
PDF version A review of  To the Secretary: Leaked Embassy Cables and America's Foreign Policy Disconnect by Mary Thompson-Jones (W.W. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:59 am by Amanda Pickens
May 23, 2016) (purported class action brought under state consumer protection laws alleging that defendants made several misrepresentations when they sold timeshare units at the beach). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
  A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 2:10 pm by Cindy Cohn
But the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit accepted the government’s argument that the court cannot yet decide whether the Fourth Amendment is violated when the government taps into the Internet cables carrying the communications of millions of Americans. [read post]