Search for: "United States v. American Precision Products Corp."
Results 81 - 100
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
Genzyme Corp., 2010 WL 5297180, at *3 (M.D. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:14 am
-centric content--English-language analysis of American professional and collegiate sports--supports the notion that the SBR website’s ‘intended audience’ was United States consumers. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Isn’t it foreseeable that the doctors would draw the analogy between the two closely related products (especially since that’s precisely what Flybynight’s reps were saying)? [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 597 F. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
”1 Aside from the granular problems stated above, and recognizing that the proposed amendments would in fact add to the problem astutely noted in the quote above by Lawrence Lessig, there is a global, more systemic conflict at issue within the realm of copyright enforcement litigation deserving mention. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:44 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:17 pm
United States that Commerce lacked the legal authority to impose CVDs on NME imports. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
United States that the US CVD law didn't apply to NME imports - for a rehearing. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
United States, 597 F. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Comcast Corp., 446 F.3d 25, 47–48 (1st Cir.2006); Hadnot v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
INS, 240 F.3d 642, 645 n.7 (7th Cir. 2001) (Nazi deportation); United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
That is exactly what happened in Sprint Nextel Corp v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:16 pm
Perhaps rebordering the Internet is inevitable, but it's bad policy for the United States to be cutting off transborder data flows, even for the putatively noble purpose of suppressing copyright infringement. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING THROUGH FARM SERVICE AGENCY, f/k/a FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Appellee. 1st District.Attorney Disqualification: BOFA SEEKS TO OUST AIG LAW FIRM FROM $10 BILLION CASE, AIG v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Indeed, there are literally hundreds of well-accepted off-label uses listed in compendia such as the United States Pharmacopeial Drug Information, and the American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information for which federal government programs provide reimbursement notwithstanding their off-label status. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:17 am
The Court does not address here whether the ECPA applies to documents stored or acts occurring outside of the United States. [read post]
