Search for: "United States v. Barrett"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,041
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
Code Section 1441, which allows defendants to remove to federal court "any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
United States, a case with potentially broad implications for the income tax system. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:14 pm
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Worley] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Collins is a continuation of aggressive, formalist opinions by the Roberts Court on separation of powers issues, striking down numerous agency arrangements with barely a nod to originalist sources.In United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
On December 12, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (“Tenth Circuit”) denied en banc hearing to the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma in Pharmacy Care Management Association v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman]. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 10:54 am
Nonetheless, Acheson Hotels v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:07 pm
Contrary to the presumption underlying the Court's approach to vacatur under United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
There is an ongoing debate over whether the MQD is a substantive canon that serves separation of powers or simply a tool of ordinary statutory interpretation, as Justice Barrett argued in her concurrence in Biden v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The couple returned to the United States in 1957. [read post]
