Search for: "United States v. Brock"
Results 81 - 100
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Brock v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Professor George Brock. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
Vance, STATE LAW PREFERENCE ACTIONS: STILL ALIVE AFTER SHERWOOD PARTNERS V. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Bagley, No. 04-4289Dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case is affirmed over a meritless claim that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution by admitting certain "other acts" evidence at trial, over his objection. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Misclassification of employees as independent contractors is found in an increasing number of workplaces in the United States, in part reflecting larger restructuring of business organizations. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
JERICHO STATE CAPITAL CORP. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 12:10 pm
” Daubert v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
There are many cases out there I could cite for that proposition, but I'm going to indulge in bias and cite the opinion written by the late United States District Judge Richard A. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Ray Patterson, Pope Brock Professor of Law, and Laura N. [read post]
13 May 2022, 7:28 am
Polo Ass'n: Gaebel is a 73-year-old retired United States Naval Commander and a senior level executive with a federal government contractor. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
Network v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
