Search for: "United States v. Campbell" Results 81 - 100 of 813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:02 am
Cobb, Jrr., and Christopher Campbell, Defendants (Memorandum, United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Pennsylvania ("EDPA"), 22-CV-815)https://brokeandbroker.com/PDF/WSFSEDPAMemo230714.pdf As set forth in the "Background" of the EDPA Memorandum: The instant case arises from an employment dispute raising claims of breach of contract, violation of Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Col... [read post]
30 May 2007, 12:34 pm
Platinum Networks in United States District Court in San Diego. $47.4M / $6K  is a 7900 to 1 ratio, which seems to be just a bit beyond the due process parameters of State Farm Insurance v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Now it’s possible to look at when people stopped saying “the United States are” and said “the United States is” by copying the contents of an entire library: a nonexpressive use. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, applied to the case at hand despite the United States Supreme Court’s 2018 holding in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:50 am by Ben Vernia
The Eleventh Circuit quickly disposed of Campbell’s argument that the award was not taxable because, as “assignee of the United States’ claim against Lockheed, he stands in the shoes of the government in receipt of a nontaxable recovery. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Campbell, invalidity theoriesof defendant Campbell were rejected, but enhanced damageanalysis by CD Cal was rejected.Campbell Company (“Campbell”) appeals from the finaljudgment of the United States District Court for theCentral District of California entering judgment in favorof Polara Engineering Inc. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:04 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The Court of Appeals concludes that the defendant’s copying is transformative within the meaning of Campbell v. [read post]