Search for: "United States v. Cardinal" Results 81 - 100 of 263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
cardinal utility function yields a real-number value for each possible state of affairs. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm by Matthew Flinn
Essentially, Carnwath LJ endorsed the application of the test set by the European Court in A v United Kingdom and elucidated in AF (No. 3). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 11:27 am by gstasiewicz
The alleged harassment and retaliation began in 2008, when Hastings was Chairman of the United States Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 12:41 am
DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual PropertyLikelihood of Confusion Noted in Motorcycle Clubs Competing Claims Over Use of 'Road Dawgs' MarkRoad Dawgs Motorcycle Club of the United States Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
United States: Unlike its predecessors, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) case does not challenge its validity. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:08 pm by justinsilverman
For those in the United States, this watchdog role is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court then decided that question in the challengers' favor: "[F]reedom of association is never mentioned in the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:22 am by Adam Chandler
” Also, at PrawfsBlawg, Bill Araiza compares three recent Supreme Court cases—Citizens United, United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:10 am by Vanessa Sauter
Sarah Grant provided an update on the United States v. al-Nashiri proceedings. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803), and the Executive’s constitutional duty “to preserve the national security,” United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am by Alex Wohl
Guy on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:46 am by Kate Fort
This, I argue, contributes to the development of a distinctive settler-state political theory which is premised on the cardinal importance of indigeneity and tribalism in settler-state constitutionalism, and on the enduring relevance of descent as a source of political and legal status in settler societies. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 10:18 am by Paul Clement
Take, for example, Justice Stevens’ solo dissent in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Co. (1933, Mont.) 26 P2d 175 [periodic immersion of injured hand into hot water]; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1919 Neb.) 173 NW 689 [x-ray procedure requiring injection of contrast substance into the kidney]; Cardinal v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm by Robert Black
“The United States Supreme Court recognized this in 1982 when it stated the issue was moot because the deadline for the ERA ratification expired before the requisite number of states approved it,” he stated. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:33 am by houndedcowed
Also mentioned are SCOTUS's invalidation of an anti-cruelty law in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But "[t]he condition of Indians in relation to the United States is perhaps unlike that of any two people in existence … marked by peculiar and cardinal distinctions that exist nowhere else," Cherokee Nation v. [read post]