Search for: "United States v. Chestnut"
Results 81 - 100
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report) E D Texas: ‘Agreement to assign’ a patent is not, by itself, actual assignment: Gellman v Telular Corporation (IP Spotlight) E D Texas: Evidence of lump sum settlements lacking per-unit royalty is inadmissible: LecTec Corporation v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Dustcontrol International (EPLAW) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Infringement action won't be stayed pending foreign decision in non-patent claim: Elmotech Ltd & Anor v Guidance Ltd & Anor (PatLit) United States US General Director Kappos testimony to Congress (Patently-O) Judge Michel: USPTO should receive $1 billion infusion of cash (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) The US Reporting on IPRs - the Watch List (IP tango) Industrial design in… [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:04 am
At this point, with the advice of an ex-editor friend of mine, I decided to reframe the issue once more, into a short book about the history of the bald eagle as a symbol in the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 9:53 am
The case that had the most profound effect on me was the first-year chestnut, Williams v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 8:15 pm
’” Perez v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) New draft EPO Guidelines for Examination (IPKat) (Innovationpartners) Now mustard (Moutarde de Bourgogne) and chestnuts (Marroni del Monfenera) secure PGI protection (Class 46) Germany BGH: Misleading use of the symbol ® - the ‘Thermoroll’ case (IPKat) Passing off in Germany: to trade or not to trade? [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm
In the 1987 case of South Dakota v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
Indeed, the United States attempted and failed to make such a showing in Grupo Mexicano. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
United States.) [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
By Michael TarrantYanmar American Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
: Federal Administrative Court rulings in CALVI and TRELLEBORG cases (International Law Office) Motion marks: Swiss IPO allows Swisscom to file MPG-file of motion mark in motion (Class 46) United Kingdom Class dispute over similarity of goods too complex for summary judgment: Daimler AG v Sany Group Co Ltd (Class 46) The war on counterfeits: how much would you spend? [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:22 am
Lees v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
or Groves v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:02 pm
That Holmes chestnut from Schenck v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:21 am
Team A v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
The new case — Staub v. [read post]
