Search for: "United States v. Duane" Results 81 - 100 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2010, 9:47 am by Steve Hall
" The ruling also implied that the state's reticence left defendant Landrigan unable to meet his burden under the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Baze v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:49 am by Scott Bomboy
The clause says the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC, , -v.- PIVOT POINT ENTERTAINMENT, LLC,; 10 Civ. 9422 (PGG) (JLC);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2011 U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
Bush appointed her to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 6:36 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Minnesota also relied on the Eighth Circuit's 2023 decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
The following is a short review of the amicus briefs that have been filed in the case.[3] United States Government When the United States government files and amicus brief, that brief is usually seen as the most important amicus brief in the case. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE:  The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 10:14 am by jlucivero
Davis – a challenge to the introduction of explicitly racially biased evidence in a Texas death penalty case – in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
2 May 2007, 2:06 am
DeFRANCISCO, ADAMS, ALESI, BONACIC, BRESLIN, BRUNO,                   CONNOR, DIAZ,   DILAN,   DUANE,   FARLEY,   FLANAGAN,   FUSCHILLO,   GOLDEN,                   GONZALEZ,    … [read post]