Search for: "United States v. Han" Results 81 - 100 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Brunetti] Could someone remind the President of the United States that there’s no law against making fun of him on TV? [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm by Heather Douglas
” – Justice Scalia in Holland v Illinois. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
It provides in relevant part: "The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by . . . citizens or subjects of any foreign state. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:34 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
United States presenta una controversia que ha dividido las cortes inferiores: “¿Qué es una “amenaza real”? [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:00 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
United States presenta una controversia que ha dividido las cortes inferiores: “¿Qué es una “amenaza real”? [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
The bill extends for two years the provision providing for payment of $13.25 per gallon to cover over a $13.50 per proof gallon excise tax on distilled spirits produced in or imported into the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:54 am by Marissa Miller
At this blog and the Volokh Conspiracy, Professor Orin Kerr examines the second question presented in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by Doug Kendall
And when conflict is unavoidable, we should not come to do battle with the United States Congress armed only with a test (congruence and proportionality) that has no demonstrable basis in the text of the Constitution and cannot objectively be shown to have been met or failed. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 1:12 pm by Schachtman
., 644 F.3d 604 (8th Cir. 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit rejected the defendant’s argument that a “full and conclusive” Rule 702 gatekeeping procedure was required before a trial court could certify a class action under the Federal Rules. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
 On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]