Search for: "United States v. Holland" Results 81 - 100 of 417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2017, 8:14 am by Peter Spiro
“It would be made upon the government of the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hollander represented Gordon in an action against the Cooperative of the building that the unit was a part of. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:43 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
On October 22, 2019, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the ’087 patent, entitled “Instrument for Treating an Ocular Disorder. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am by Tobias Thienel
United Kingdom and previously held to be correct as a matter of international law by a number of American and English judges (Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:07 am
”Addressing the merits of Diederich’s ultra vires argument, the court said that “retaining a law firm to prepare an amicus brief for a case pending before the United States Supreme Court that includes an issue of significance to the Authority falls within the powers conferred to the Authority by the Legislature,” citing Public Authorities Law §2053-c [4]; §2053-e [12]..* The brief amicus curiae [friend of the court] had been prepared by… [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:16 am
In Grotian fashion, coastal states near whose waters such research might be conducted by other states -- the Insight mentions Peru and Argentina -- maintain that the Argo float and similar research activities fall within the United Nations' regulatory structure established by the 1982 U.N. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by Erin Miller
United States (08-1301) – petitioner’s reply brief United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm by Heather Douglas
” – Justice Scalia in Holland v Illinois. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am by Cormac Early
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has video of a recent conference of privacy law scholars on the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment searches, which was embraced by the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 1:24 pm
  Relying heavily on the case of Hollander v. [read post]