Search for: "United States v. Kenneth Still" Results 81 - 100 of 242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2018, 8:27 pm by Ken White
The feds — through the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York — prosecuted Eng for an incident years before during his troubles at NYU. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost discusses last week’s oral argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am by Wolfgang Demino
 Plaintiff also seeks an additional $2,500 for post-judgment motions, $5,000 for an appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and $2,500 for an appeal to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am by Scott Bomboy
” That memo cites a quote from an 1882 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by John Floyd
”   The Second Circuit Court of Appeals tackled this novel question in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:27 am by Jordan Brunner
The move is a radical departure from the policy of the Obama administration and also of numerous European allies of the United States, and comes as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday that Assad’s fate “will be decided by the Syrian people. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am by Schachtman
For better or worse, litigation has become an adjunct to regulation in the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
“Denial“, a film based on Deborah Lipstadt’s book of the 2000 libel trial, Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt (see Gray J’s judgment, [2000] EWHC 115 (QB))  has been released in the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
On the one hand, we have the European Convention on Human Rights, which is directly applicable in the United Kingdom, but is largely confined to negative rights (to be free from interference), some of which have been interpreted as having a positive component requiring the State to protect us from each other. [read post]