Search for: "V. Vasquez"
Results 81 - 100
of 460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2007, 10:39 am
The judges in a case I mentioned in the previous post, Vasquez-Lopez v Beneficial Oregon Inc, discuss arbitration riders at some length. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:21 pm
Vasquez, 09-2411 (7th Cir. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:24 am
In the first case, Vasquez v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Vasquez v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm
Contrary to ACS's contention, the deprivation of the right to counsel is a [29 A.D.3d 1016] fundamental error warranting reversal (see Matter of Otto v Otto, 26 AD3d 498 [2006]; Matter of Miranda v Vasquez, 14 AD3d 566 [2005]; Matter of Knight v Griffith, 13 AD3d 449 [2004]; Matter of Vladimir M., 206 AD2d 482, 483 [1994]; Matter of Williams v Williams, 91 AD2d 1044, 1045 [1983]). [read post]
2nd Circuit “Cat’s Paw” decision highlights importance of employer investigations before termination
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Last week’s 2nd Circuit decision in Vasquez v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 6:00 am
Striking down as unconscionable a ban on class actions in an "arbitration rider" to a loan agreement, the court in Vasquez-Lopez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
Vasquez, and Park v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 5:14 am
In Vasquez, the mother filed a petition to hold the father in civil contempt for violating an order of visitation. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:59 pm
Pyett (2009) 556 U.S. 247], and Vasquez [v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:26 am
I'm confident that Justice Baltodano is right here, and it points out an interesting way to avoid arbitration that I hadn't considered before. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:57 am
Even though I teach Civil Procedure rather than Contracts, every year, I talk about unconscionability, particularly with respect to arbitration agreements (which is, after all, a Civ Pro subject). [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 11:57 am
Even if a key witness is deaf, cannot speak, and has not learned sign language, she can still properly testify at a criminal trial.Sure, a defendant's ability to cross-examine that witness is somewhat limited, since she's using somewhat ambiguous facial expressions, gestures, and lip movements to both understand and respond to questioning. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:12 pm
I typically talk about opinions in which I think the appellate court was (at least partially) wrong, on the theory that it's not all that useful for me to just mimic what the opinion already says. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:00 pm
Let me say at the outset that I have little to no knowledge of the practical details of criminal law. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:25 pm
Who needs me when you have Justice Gilbert, who write the following as the first two sentences of this opinion:"The new owner of a house prepares to move in. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
A helpful reader made sure that I did not miss the decision by the Ninth Circuit to deny en banc review in US v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 12:19 pm
In the recent case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 3:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
