Search for: "Versa Marketing, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
By 2012 Enterprise had 30.1% of the UK market, Europcar 26%. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:01 pm
Case citation: LBF Travel, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:52 am
Moreover, the most innovative brands are experimenting with native content – as opposed to the more mundane native ads – and there is a growing consensus among the pioneers that transparency and trust are so integral to brand equity that market forces should self-correct potentially deceptive practices. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:34 am
So McDonalds, Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:49 pm
The question arises because under the fraud-on-the-market (FOTM) theory, adopted by the Court in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:06 am
Demoulas Super Markets, Inc., 424 Mass. 501, at 528-529 (1997) quoting Judge Cardozo in Meinhard v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:06 am
Demoulas Super Markets, Inc., 424 Mass. 501, at 528-529 (1997) quoting Judge Cardozo in Meinhard v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
Boynton & Boynton, Inc., No. 12–05610, 2014 WL 317179 (D.N.J. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Co-op., Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 2:22 pm
., Inc. and Century Securities Associates Inc. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:19 am
As Willis puts it, “Consumers realized that there is an immediate intangible benefit to opting out — the marketing stops. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with a comment by Eric; followed by a massive supplement from Eric] [Eric's intro: sometimes, a draft blog post misses the publication window and then comes out painfully late. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:12 pm
Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 7:37 am
These economic considerations include the extent to which end-users/customers of the equipment and software benefit from increased market competition due to the inclusion of foreign suppliers, and how particular security solutions that the United States adopts could impact U.S. businesses and their position in other markets. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:59 am
But I am aware of only one case that suggests that TRIPS might be relevant for interpreting U.S. substantive law: in Rotec Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 12:23 am
Accolade, Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:38 pm
John Malone, a director of Discovery Communications, Inc. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:54 am
Such queries came to this Kat's mind when considering the General Court's judgment in Case T-361/11 Hand Held Products, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), where the similarity between goods in the same class for the identical word sign DOLPHIN was assessed on the application of EU law's well-known relevant factors including, among other things, nature, intended purpose, method of use, whether the goods are in… [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:31 pm
., Inc., 607 A.2d 708 (1992) (“Marple I”). [read post]
