Search for: "Warren Heller" Results 81 - 100 of 123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2010, 4:58 am by Kevin Jon Heller
by Kevin Jon Heller Hell must have had central air conditioning installed, because I find myself in complete agreement with Ruth Wedgwood’s recent post at EJIL: Talk! [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
What will the Supreme Court be like without its liberal leader? [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:31 am by Kent Scheidegger
  In the guns case, the Court did "incorporate" the Second Amendment as applicable to state laws, but that result was nearly a foregone conclusion between Heller's description of the right to bear arms and the Warren-era precedents on incorporation. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:05 am by JB
The Chicago ordinance, which bans handguns in the home, is likely to be held unconstitutional under Heller. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:25 am by Kent Scheidegger
Heller is "incorporated" in the Fourteenth Amendment and made applicable to the states. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:40 am
 When she was up for confirmation as SG, Kagan declined to say whether she agreed or disagreed with Heller, stating that as SG, her personal view of the matter would not be relevant. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:27 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
by Kevin Jon Heller He’s obviously not my favorite Justice — my con-law professor, Gerald Guenther, always referred to me as Justice Black — but I think it’s fantastic for the school nonetheless. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
After Stevens What will the Supreme Court be like without its liberal leader? … [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
  Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal, Bill Mears of CNN, Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor, David Savage of the L.A. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
Warren Richey at the Christian Science Monitor also covers the denial of cert. in Haskell County Board of Commissioners v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Heller), Kurt Lash, and David Gans, and will address the case's potential impact on the privileges and immunities clauses. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:16 am
Heller itself makes them, and they can often make sense. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:19 am
"We don't comment on these types of matters," said Hogan chairman Warren Gorrell (pictured right). [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:51 am
  DeJesus-Rueff cites a fascinating anecdote about Chief Justice Warren's experiences immediately before the Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 8:49 am by Nico Jacobellis
Pa. 1825) on the meaning of the P or I Clause;Just how damn radical the radical Republicans of the Reconstruction Congress were.I don't think any case since the Warren Court has put more primordial, man-vs-state, N(n)atrual L(law) principles before the justices, and perhaps no case since Slaughterhouse itself. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:04 pm
Jackson, an outgrowth of  Warren Court criminal procedure law. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 6:46 am
The Court rejected this view.The Heller decision, however, does not instantly apply to states and municipalities. [read post]