Search for: "White v. Department Of Corrections"
Results 81 - 100
of 781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2008, 12:28 pm
"We regret," the statement said, "that the department didn't catch the 2006 law when the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 2:00 am
The Department concluded that Petitioner’s injury interfered with her ability to handle a firearm. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:32 am
As cases go, Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 10:37 am
Byrd v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:37 pm
This was not a mathematical or arithmetic slip of the kind that might be capable of correction using that procedure. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm
” Following sweeping Republican gains in state governments in 2010 and discussions with the White House and Treasury Department, however, the IRS changed its draft regulations in March 2011. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
Department of Corrections, 2008 U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:08 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 9:54 am
Prison policies like these violate the Supreme Court precedent set in Turner v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
In the case, Crawford v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2013 U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 10:02 pm
Karr v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:03 am
Allow the USEPA to challenge preconstruction projections that actual events have already proven correct? [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 26, 2008 White v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Plaintiff was no longer in custody of the Utah Department of Corrections but, instead, had been temporarily transferred to federal custody to face federal charges.In Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:14 pm
In Flores v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
See, Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
When I read Wireman v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:13 am
” McGahn’s Supplemental Brief In response, McGahn, represented by Justice Department lawyers, argues that the panel decision was correct because Article III bars judicial resolution of interbranch suits. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm
By the same token, the White Queen in Through the Looking Glass famously boasted she was able to believe "six impossible things before breakfast. [read post]
