Search for: "Whited v. Miller*"
Results 81 - 100
of 621
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
Bank, Sheer, Seymour & Hashmall, White Plains, NY (Jay B. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Missouri Legislative Employee's Pro-Mask-Mandate Speech Protected by First Amendment
23 Jun 2022, 5:28 am
From Mayfield v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
Dist., [*2]154 AD3d 754; Matter of White v Roosevelt Union Free School Dist. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm
Dist., [*2]154 AD3d 754; Matter of White v Roosevelt Union Free School Dist. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:30 am
White, 984 F.3d 76 (D.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:49 pm
Discharged home after negative stool culture despite low platelet count with diagnosis of infectious colitis v. inflammatory bowel disease. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
What will America become if, as reported, the five most conservative members of the US Supreme Court angrily and emphatically overrule Roe v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am
Moldovan MPs have passed a ban on Russian war symbols, including the letters Z and V and the St George ribbon. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 8:54 am
–State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:53 pm
Kaplan of Saxena White PA. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 12:01 am
Supreme Court in Bradwell v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 5:52 am
Neifert-White Co., 390 U.S. 228, 232 (1968). [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
That includes a video calling for lawmakers to be hung in front of the White House that has now been viewed more than 60,000 times. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
Roper v. [read post]