Search for: "Williams v. American Plan Corp." Results 81 - 100 of 184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 Howard E King, The lawyer for Thicke, WIlliams and co-writer rapper TI, said the decision set a "horrible precedent for music and creativity going forward". [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Brookings’ William McCants points out that, if confirmed, the attack could prompt serious backlash by Russian forces against the Islamic State. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Those decisions, which upheld employers’ affirmative action plans against Title VII challenges, called for application of the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth by the High Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green (3 EPD ¶8607). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
By William Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Katherine Hart, Glen Hansen, and Brian Russell Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2014 1st Quarter CEQA update. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
American United Life Insurance Company 13-536Issue: Whether the court below erroneously held, in conflict with the decisions of six other circuits, that a person who exercises some authority or control over the assets of an ERISA plan is a fiduciary with respect to that plan only if he is alleged to have “mismanaged” the plan’s assets. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013), and Harden Manufacturing Corp. v. [read post]