Search for: "Williams v. Department of Corrections" Results 81 - 100 of 779
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
Collins called for an investigation into conflicts of interest at the DOJ on its handling of the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, and was he ever correct. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
Virginia Department of Corrections, 2014 U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:59 am
  It just may be, if David Kopel at VC is correct when he writes: District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 1:13 pm by Wells Bennett
Department of Homeland Security—or the ”No-Fly List Case” [h/t Wired]. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:32 pm by Florian Mueller
It's been a few years since I last woke up to a significant procedural order ("signficant" as opposed to lawyers' appearances being approved) in Oracle v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 OATH Administrative Law Judge denies employer’s motion to strike the testimony of two witnesses called by the accused NYC Department of Corrections v Williams, OATH Index No. 2223/15In this hearing conducted pursuant to Civil Service Law §75, OATH Administrative Law Judge John B. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm by Howard Friedman
Washington Department of Corrections, 2013 U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 12:08 pm
Showalter moves into the post following the retirement of current IP Department Chair Jerry Mills.IPBiz notes William C. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
Arizona Department of Corrections director Charles Ryan may have lost his recurring role with the expected dismissal of Ryan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:29 pm by Zachary Spilman
I give you the words of Chief Justice William H. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:18 pm
Petitioners, inmates in Michigan prisons, filed grievances using the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) grievance process. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:17 am by Scott Michelman
The Third Circuit affirmed, holding both that the defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity and that Delaware Department of Corrections Commissioner Stanley Taylor and prison warden Raphael Williams could be subject to supervisory liability for failing to supervise prison staff if their failure reflected deliberate indifference (which is the standard for the underlying Eighth Amendment claim). [read post]