Search for: "YORK v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER" Results 81 - 100 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
November 16, 2018Matrimonial Rules and Forms Revised Effective September 30, 2018By administrative order of the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts section 202.50(b)(3) of the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court and the County Court (22 NYCRR § 202.50[b][3]), were amended effective September 30, 2018. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
November 16, 2018Matrimonial Rules and Forms Revised Effective September 30, 2018By administrative order of the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts section 202.50(b)(3) of the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court and the County Court (22 NYCRR § 202.50[b][3]), were amended effective September 30, 2018. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  But now, a year or so after the EDGAR data breach, with four (out of five) new SEC commissioners, the SEC’s interest in investigating and charging outsider trading appears to be waning and is no longer a priority. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 1:13 pm by Elizabeth A. Khalil
SEPTEMBER Sept 1: Deadline for implementation of the following requirements for the New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Rule: audit trail capabilities, monitoring program, application security, limitations on data retention, and encryption of non-public information at rest and in motion. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” This week the SEC filed an administrative action against a California-based company selling digital tokens to investors to raise capital for its block chain-based food review service. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Socially Aware has published Social Links, a round up of the most important stories in the world of social media this week. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Ten Network has gone into administration after failing to win financial backing from its leading shareholders. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
A few weeks ago, for instance, a federal district court judge (Eric Vitaliano of the Eastern District of New York) wrote an opinion rejecting a Social Security ligitant’s request to get an early opinion taken down from the court’s site (see also Eric Goldman’s post on this case): In February 2014, plaintiff Tamara Nelson filed a complaint, seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security… [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  There is a plausible argument against this power that might, however, be of some utility to the sanctuary cities: The Supreme Court has said (in New York v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"*If the election workers are covered by a Section 218 Agreement with the Social Security Administration (SSA), the terms of the Agreement will determine whether the payments are subject to FICA.** A candidate seeking election to a school board is typically deemed to be seeking office in a “non-partisan” election. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Divorce lawyer said that in New York, the concept of a supplemental needs trust originated in 1978, establishing a vehicle for parents and guardians of adult children with severe and chronic disabilities to provide for their children's future by transferring their funds to a trust, created to pay for items that will enhance their children's quality of life without jeopardizing their children's eligibility for government benefits, such as Supplemental… [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It is now well established that the AFDC program in New York, while administered by local Social Services officials under the supervision of the State Agency, receives up to 75 per cent federal reimbursement and is controlled by federal requirements under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]