Search for: "Zimmer US, Inc. " Results 81 - 100 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Trading Technologies Int’l., Inc., No. 19-120 (definition of  “technological invention” for CBM) Zimmer, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 1:29 pm
” Safe Patient wants the makers of hip and knee implants, including Biomet, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Smith & Nephew, Stryker Corporation, Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Zimmer Holdings Inc., to provide a 20-year warranty that:covers the full cost of revision surgery, including the device itself, the surgeon and hospital costs and patient out-of-pocket costs; establishes a clear system for patients to use, including a toll-free phone line and a… [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 6:22 pm
Meantime, the regulator has asked all-metal hip implant makers, including Zimmer Holdings Inc. and Johnson & Johnson to conduct their own, long-term studies of the implant devices to get more information. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:39 pm
Ashcroft attended a September news conference in Newark where Christie named him as monitor for Zimmer Holdings Inc., of Warsaw, Ind., one of five makers of replacement hips and knees that agreed to pay $310 million and accept federal monitors to settle concerns over doctor kickbacks. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:15 am
This medical device is used in procedures for treating Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP). [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
Zimmer, Inc., 927 F.2d 124, 130 (2d Cir. 1991) (New York law) (“Failure to warn claims purporting to sound in strict liability and those sounding in negligence are essentially the same. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Zimmer Biomet, No. 1:16-cv-01670, a California federal district court found a public-policy rift between Michigan and California law concerning non-competes. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:11 am by Schachtman
Zimmer, Inc., MDL No. 2272, Master Docket No. 11 C 5468, No. 12 C 6279, 2015 WL 5050214 (N.D. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
“The mere presence of [other safety devices] somewhere at the work site” does not satisfy defendant’s duty to provide appropriate safety devices (Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 NY2d 513, 524, rearg denied 65 NY2d 1054; see Williams v City of Niagara Falls, 43 AD3d 1426; Whiting v Dave Hennig, Inc., 28 AD3d 1105, 1106). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:50 am by Michelle Yeary
  Or, if knowing the largest pharmaceutical MDL to date is something you can use as an ice breaker. [read post]