Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2013, 5:08 pm
” (Shaaban Bin Hussien v Chong Fook Kam [1970] AC 942, at 948). [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
Litzinger then called the First Assistant United States Attorney for North Dakota, who said that the VHS tapes were within the scope of the warrant. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
In English law the “conventional figures” are much higher than in, say, France but much lower than in the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:18 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:16 pm
ACS stated that it had proven "aggravated circumstances" and that the infant was a "severely" abused child as defined in Family Court Act § 1012 (j) and Social Services Law § 384-b (8) (a), and that Respondent Mother failed to rebut any of the evidence presented by ACS. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 11:29 am
In last week’s case (Westfield v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:43 am
AC-305-NCMB-NCR-100-07-11-12. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:50 am
D'Amico v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 12:34 am
Old Hong Kong v New Hong Kong here, here and here Hong Kong IPD here Hong Kong alley cat adoptions here [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
The court was told that after the third report was completed and sent to all parties, the complainer, solicitor Ms Crabbe, stated that the reporter had not seen all the documentation he was supposed to have. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
In a prior blog post, we summarized the Court of Appeals decision in the case of AC Excavating, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
In the Spycatcher case (Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No. 2) [1990] 1 AC 109) and later in Attorney-General v Blake [1997] Ch 84 it was suggested that the Crown might have a constructive trust over the copyright in the two spys' books. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:01 am
After finding that the Petitioners had standing to challenge the SEQRA determination, the Court held: "under the circumstances of this case, the County improperly segmented the SEQRA review of the OCSD extension from the Mountco project (see 6 NYCRR 617.3[g][1]; Matter of Village of Westbury v Department of Transp. of State of N.Y., 75 NY2d 62; Matter of AC I Shore Rd., LLC v Incorporated Vil. of Great Neck, 43 AD3d 439, 442; Matter of Long Is. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:20 pm
Nor is it necessary that Honeywell have directly ac- cused Arkema of potential indirect infringement. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:21 pm
At close of business on Tuesday, Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 12:23 am
In a third case, in Vault Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am
Jackson filed her brief in United States v. [read post]
