Search for: "BOUNDS V. STATE" Results 981 - 1000 of 10,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 10:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The CAFC gave background on assignments:We have stated that “[a]lthough state law governs the interpretation of contracts generally . . . the question of whether a patent assignment clause creates an automatic assignment or merely an obligation to assign is intimately bound up with the question of standing in patent cases. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am by Jonathan Bailey
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its long-awaited ruling in the case of Google v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
This is a very different state of affairs to the prospective liability of search engine operators such as Google Inc under data protection laws, as recognised in Google Spain. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
Sale of a Business, thenLicense AgreementTrademarkGoodwillGeographically Bounded Rights to TrademarksTrade DressBreach of ContractLouisiana LawAn attempt to simultaneously sell a restaurant and license associated intellectual property has led to ten years of litigation in state and federal court.The Bill of Sale has a choice of law provision stating it is “governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Louisiana. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:01 am by Genevieve Nadeau
The Supreme Court has never adopted the theory (indeed, it has previously rejected it), but recently agreed to hear Moore v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or Courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 7:47 pm
  The question is, in the words of McEachern C.J.B.C. as stated above, has one party demonstrated an unwillingness to be bound by the agreement by insisting upon terms or conditions which have not been agreed upon or are not reasonably implied? [read post]