Search for: "Deal v. USA"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm
Philip Morris USA, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
The Council for Public Interest Law set up by the Ford Foundation in USA defined "public interest litigation" in its report of Public Interest Law, USA, 1976 as follows: "Public Interest Law is the name that has recently been given to efforts provide legal representation to previously unrepresented groups and interests. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:18 am
Back v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 5:07 pm
This is because paper course packs are becoming obsolete, and the CCH v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:43 am
Tull, 126 P.3d 196, 201 (Colo. 2006) (citing Rhino Linings USA, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:01 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256, 1274 (11th Circ. 2009) (quoting Rollins, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:30 pm
Kwikset Corporation v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
United Food Import (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 49: Following first Niagara, TTAB rules that foreign owner sufficiently pleaded use of mark in USA: Petróleos Mexicanos v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
Ramadas Shenoy v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:59 pm
USA v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 1:15 pm
Moo Young v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:25 pm
Because, in Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 3:04 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Many papers on legal communication were presented at NCA 10: The 96th Annual Convention of the National Communication Association, held November 14-17, 2010 in San Francisco, California, USA. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:25 pm
Interestingly, the revised version, which I understand dates from December 7, 2010, omits the reference to the six part test from the SCC in CCH v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
Ernest Freeberg, in Democracy’s Prisoner: Eugene V. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(PatLit) Judgment of similarity of designs in China (Class 99) Denmark When toilet seats make impressions on their users: Duravit AG v B&N Developing ApS (Class 99) Europe European patent – Further steps to enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPJUR) (IPKat) (inovia) (IAM) General Court: More absolute grounds: KOMPRESSOR PLUS (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion: Bianchin v OHMI – Grotto (GASOLINE) (Class 46) General Court finds HALLUX descriptive for… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm
That changed in 2004, when a unanimous Supreme Court strongly affirmed its support for a balanced approach to copyright law and in the process breathed new life into the Copyright Act’s fair dealing provision in a case called Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
