Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
June 1, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Domestic Relations Law 253 does not provide that a defendant must provide plaintiff with a GetIn Cohen v Cohen, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2112972, 2019 N.Y. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
Shipman, 357 N.C. at 474-75, 586 S.E.2d at 253-54 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:32 am
Notably, the exclusion does not extend to family offices serving multiple families. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:58 am
The Court of Justice seems to believe it does. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 11:07 am
’” 780 So.2d at 54 (quoting First Nat. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
”[1] This debate took an hour to get through, and it was mostly because it had 6 public comments on it. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
The 86 Questions (as extracted by insideview.ie) 1. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 8:32 pm
Group 1 1. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:06 am
Group 1 1. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
Our court of appeals has held that: Although Rule 54(d)(1) does create a presumption for awarding costs to prevailing parties, it also places on the losing party the burden to show why costs should not be awarded. . . . [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:01 pm
It is not in dispute that this disclaimer relates to an “undisclosed disclaimer” in the sense of decision G 1/03 [2, 1st §], that is, it does not have a basis in the application as filed. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 11:28 am
For instance, it would consider an unpatentability finding by the PTAB about Claim 1 of a patent to be inconsistent with a district court finding that Claim 54 is not invalid. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm
In the leading Entry 54 cases (Hingir Rampur Coal Co, MA Tulloch and Baijnath Kedia), the Supreme Court held that this is irrelevant, because Entry 54 denudes the States of competence the moment the declaration is made by Parliament. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 9:19 am
App. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (Nov. 17, 2020). (1) The State and the defendant’s version of events were inconsistent. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:25 pm
This bill regulates the fund entity (as opposed to the management company) and does so through the power of the state to regulate banking. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
The nature of an occupation, standing alone, does not provide sanctuary from the Sherman Act, nor is the public-service aspect of professional practice controlling in determining whether § 1 includes professions. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
According to decision G 2/88 novelty within the meaning of A 54(1) can be acknowledged in cases where the discovery of a new technical effect of a known substance leads to an invention which is defined in the claims in terms of the use of that substance for a hitherto unknown, new non-medical purpose reflecting such effect, even if the only novel feature defined in the claims is the purpose for which the substance is used. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:02 pm
Minaya, supra, 54 N.Y.2d at 365, 445 N.Y.S.2d 690, 429 N.E.2d 1161; 29 N.Y.Jur.2d, Courts and Judges, § 463. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
The statute also requires the Secretary to report “the tabulation of total population by States” to the President by January 1, 2021. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:59 am
Defendant’s statement also does not fail for lack of immediacy. [read post]
