Search for: "Driver v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 10,257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2012, 9:52 am
In Cabral v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:00 pm
Additional Resources: Coffey v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:51 pm
Weber v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
The plaintiff successfully sued the other driver involved in her car accident and the other driver’s excess liability insurer, and was awarded damages. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:06 am
In Jackson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:33 pm
New York State courts have adopted a rule known as "the Noseworthy Doctrine" (first established in the case of Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76), which permits the jury to draw an inference in favor of the dead victim of a car accident such as this one. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:33 pm
New York State courts have adopted a rule known as "the Noseworthy Doctrine" (first established in the case of Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76), which permits the jury to draw an inference in favor of the dead victim of a car accident such as this one. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 5:52 am
Additional Resources: Perry v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:21 am
Darrow v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 7:42 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:02 am
Thurman was a bus driver. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 2:13 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In an opinion in Thomas v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:37 am
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:51 pm
In affirming the trial court’s decision, the state supreme court receded from the 1984 precedent set in the case of Florida Physician’s Insurance Reciprocal v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
[Post by Jake McGowan] United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 6:09 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 4:10 am
State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
It was in that case that Lord Reid stated that it was quite possible for a motorist to be very much more to blame than a pedestrian due to the fact that a pedestrian while crossing a road has to look left and right as well as forwards while a driver does not. [read post]
