Search for: "Goode v. Delaware" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Delaware Supreme Court stirred up quite a bit of controversy earlier this year in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 5:47 am by Jack Sharman
Dervan at the White Collar Crime Prof blog, focusing on the Delaware Supreme Court opinion in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
Apparel Mart also has the power to withhold payments for goods received in the event it determines that any manufacturer has breached the Supplier Code of Conduct, and ultimately to terminate the agreement for such breaches. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 2:45 am by Broc Romanek
Books & Records: Delaware Extends Inspection Rights to Privileged Internal Investigation Documents Recently, the Delaware Supreme Court – in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 3:45 am by David DePaolo
Since Vitas had obtained no adjudication that Marazas was its employee before Marazas withdrew his civil suit, nothing was stopping Vitas from changing its argument in defense of the workers' compensation claim.Commentators on the opinion disagreed with the Court's reasoning on estoppel, but the result is the same: employee and employer don't have a good relationship and it spills into a dispute resolution mechanism - in this case both civil and work comp forums.And while… [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:32 am by Gustav L. Schmidt
  Thus, while there may be good reasons for incorporating or reincorporating in Delaware (e.g., because a private equity investor requires it as a condition for investment), the costs of using a Delaware corporation are probably not justified in most cases. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 3:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Delaware Supreme Court stirred up quite a bit of controversy earlier this year in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:40 am by nedaj
In order to rely on this relief, the withholding agent, Foreign Financial Institution (“FFI”) or other subject entity must make a “good faith” effort to comply with FATCA requirements. [read post]
Under Delaware’s corporate benefit doctrine, a stockholder who presents a meritorious claim to a board of directors may be entitled to attorneys’ fees if the stockholder’s efforts result in the conferring of a corporate benefit. [1] On June 20, 2014, the Delaware Chancery Court considered in Raul v. [read post]