Search for: "In Re Standing Order With Reasons Regarding Objections" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am by Stefanie Levine
Microsoft responded that it had objected to the clear and convincing standard but did not ask for that precise instruction. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am by Stefanie Levine
Microsoft responded that it had objected to the clear and convincing standard but did not ask for that precise instruction. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am by John Culhane
Snyder, with a re- source and his name was Matthew. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:38 am by azatty
If re-elected, I would address these issues as follows: Petition the Supreme Court to decrease Bar dues. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It requires that State to seek such additional information and enables the Requesting State to obtain a reasonable extension of time to obtain and transmit the supplemental information in order to cure any defects found by either the court or the government authorities in the Requested State. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
[by] stating the reasons for [its] rejection, or objection or requirement, together with such information and refer- ences as may be useful in judging of the propriety of continuing the prosecution of [the] application. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am by Stefanie Levine
Although intent to deceive is subject to an objective standard, such that “the fact of misrepresentation coupled with proof that the party making it had knowledge of its falsity is enough to warrant drawing the inference that there was a fraudulent intent,” a false marking complaint must provide “specific underlying facts” in order “to reasonably infer that the defendant was aware that the patent expired. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm by George Lenard
This assessment suggests that there is still a loophole for employers’ to leap through in order to avoid being liable for a decision. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:41 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  In addition, items that clearly would have generated a storm of controversy if introduced as a stand-alone bill were quietly buried in the budget bill. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm by Law Lady
BRUCE, Appellee. 3rd District.Secured transactions -- Deficiency judgment after creditor had sold repossessed industrial earthmoving equipment -- Trial court erred in entering summary judgment for deficiency judgment where there was factual issue as to whether sale of repossessed equipment through private sale and internet auction was commercially reasonable -- Summary judgment was n [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:37 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  He does recognise that “there undoubtedly would be strong objections from the Council of Europe were the UK to consider rejecting the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights” but contends that “they would be based on political and diplomatic rather than legal ones”. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:22 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix
  He does recognise that “there undoubtedly would be strong objections from the Council of Europe were the UK to consider rejecting the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights” but contends that “they would be based on political and diplomatic rather than legal ones”. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm by Ailyn Cabico
  Specifically, the letter to the NASAA was intended to provide comments regarding the proposed model custody rule of the NASAA that was released on February 17, 2011. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:48 pm
However, until we can get them recognized as such within the boundaries of the DSC, we have a situation on our hands which requires a prompt and decisive response.The purpose of this memorandum is to set out the strategies which the Presiding Bishop (PB) has decided upon, in consultation with her Chancellor and her Special Assistant for Litigation, in order to deal with the rebellious forces in the DSC.First: The following principles are given, as previously established by… [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am by Ray Dowd
[edit] Purpose and characterThe first factor is regarding whether the use in question helps fulfill the intention of copyright law to stimulate creativity for the enrichment of the general public, or whether it aims to only "supersede the objects" of the original for reasons of personal profit. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:38 am by Dan
There are plenty of good and serious and smart Americans on both sides of the debate regarding China and its currency and Mr. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 7:53 pm by Stephen Page
The concern is exacerbated significantly when regard is had to the (notorious) fact that, since the Full Court in B and R made reference to data “... partly constituted by readily accessible public information of which it would be expected that a trial Judge would inform himself or herself... [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:41 pm by Joel Bolstein
"  That conclusion was based on the fact that MFS had failed to present evidence upon which a reasonable jury could find liability on the constitutional claims and also on the fact that "a reasonably objective regulator would not know that his conduct was unlawful. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:44 pm by Isabel McArdle
JR1, Re Judicial Review [2011] NIQB 5 – Read judgment A decision of the Northern Ireland high court has highlighted the continued narrow definition of “standing”, or the right to bring a claim, under the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]