Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 981 - 1000
of 18,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:55 am
Re (University of Virginia School of Law) has posted Does the Discourse on 303 Creative Portend a Standing Realignment? [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 7:55 am
Which means Held v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
No application was made to vacate the hearing and re-list it after the proceedings had been regularised in that way. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
The conference was kicked off by a keynote speech by Justice Philip Jeyaretnam (Singapore International Commercial Court), providing an in-depth analysis of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Anupam Mittal v Westbridge Ventures II [2023] SGCA 1 (discussed in more detail here). [read post]
Of Insurrections, Presidents, and the Utter Failure of Constitutional Law to Address the Real Issues
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
This case, In Re Griffin, according to the authors, "continues to cast a shadow over Section 3 today. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
Archbishops’ Commission for Racial Justice – Third Report The Archbishops’ Commission for Racial Justice (ACRJ) has published its Summer ’23 Biennial Report, the third in a series of six. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am
With negotiations re-convening in just a few short days, it’s crucial that everyone lift their voices to ensure this proposed treaty doesn’t set human rights and tech law back by decades. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
” City of Detroit v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 4:50 am
In 2012, in the United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:56 pm
EPA, and—most recently—Biden v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:13 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
” Sanders v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
Twenty Years of The IPKat was published by Oxford University Press in spring 2023.And, speaking of the book, we are happy to re-publish the review that Bill Patry (Mayer Brown) provided of it, as just published by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Contrairement à ce que font valoir les appelants, rien dans R. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 3:17 am
The trial of the United States v. [read post]
