Search for: "In re Application of Johns" Results 981 - 1000 of 6,576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2019, 3:34 am
” In re Carlson, 91 U.S.P.Q.2d 1198, 1203 (T.T.A.B. 2009). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 2:41 am by John L. Welch
In re John Lankshear, Serial No. 85239139 (June 6, 2013) [not precedential].To support a Section 2(e)(3) refusal, the PTO must first show that the place named in the mark is generally known to relevant consumers, and not remote or obscure. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:33 am by John L. Welch
The Board pointed out that Dating DNA must show "excusable neglect" in order to justify re-opening. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:29 am
In re Imaginif, Inc., Serial No. 86803751 (November 21, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:04 am by John L. Welch
In re Thomas White Int'l, Ltd., Serial No. 77080379 (February 28, 2013) [precedential].The specimen of use was a 52-page "pdf" entitled "Annual Report" for investment funds named "Thomas White Funds," for which applicant is the advisor. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:59 am
The Board found that "although Applicant’s and Registrant’s goods are somewhat related, the dissimilarities in their respective marks, coupled with the mostly diverse channels of trade and sophisticated classes of purchasers, create 'a confluence of facts which persuasively point to confusion as being unlikely.'" In re The Crosby Group LLC, Serial No. 86780353 (April 17, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Heasley).The Marks: The Board… [read post]