Search for: "In re Application of Wells"
Results 981 - 1000
of 22,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2018, 2:51 am
Since the cited mark is not well-known, applicant asserted, confusion is not likely. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 7:35 am
Below are a few noteworthy changes that applicants should be well aware of before filing in Canada. [read post]
27 May 2010, 1:42 pm
On Wednesday May 26, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued its opinion in In re Mason Minors, Case No. 139785. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:08 am
The USPTO, EPO and JPO have re-opened or are just about to re-open for applications to the pilot. [read post]
12 May 2012, 8:32 pm
" (citing In re Morris). [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:35 am
Let me offer a couple quibbles re: the fine-grained legal theory. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:32 am
If so, you're not alone: A survey by Jobvite Inc. shows that more than 80% of companies do. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:41 am
” The fast-track The PTO believes that many of the delayed applications will be abandoned by the applicant prior to paying the fee to re-enter the examination process. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:49 am
The Council also made four re-appointments of members of the Enlarged Board of Appeal and Chairmen and legally qualified members of the of Boards of Appeal pursuant to Art 11(3) EPC, as well as a total of twelve appointments and re-appointments of legally qualified members of the Enlarged Board of Appeal pursuant to Art 11(5) EPC. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:37 am
In re Boon, 439 F.2d 724, 728 (CCPA 1971). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:09 am
In re Pearl 9 Group LLC, Serial No. 86539117 (October 11, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie). [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:11 am
In re Uncle Sam GmbH, Application Serial No. 79187215 (July 31, 2019) [not presidential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
T 278/00 [2]) so as to enable the parties and, in case of an appeal, the board of appeal to examine whether the decision was justified or not. [1.3] In the board’s judgment the decision under appeal violates both fundamental requirements for the following reasons. [2] Claim 1 defines a method “for determining how many wells to drill in a plurality of oil and gas field assets” which is defined by a number of algorithmic, mostly mathematical steps operating on variables… [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 11:05 am
The Examining Attorney has refused registration of Applicant's proposed mark … on the ground that Applicant's proposed mark fails to function as a mark for the goods identified in the application because the proposed mark is a commonplace term widely used by a variety of sources that merely conveys an ordinary, familiar, and well-recognized concept or sentiment…. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:50 pm
Here is where things get, well, weird. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:29 pm
" Appellant's Br. 12-13 (quoting In re Beaver, 893 F.2d 329, 330 (Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:02 pm
Step Four: Make sure the application is well organized with supporting documents demonstrating that you qualify for the position based on your academic credentials and experience, and to prove that the job is complex enough to qualify as a specialty occupation. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:22 am
Whether or not this application of a concept derived from exponential growth is applicable in the Covid19 context might be questioned. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
In re Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC, No. 77484850 (April 11, 2012) [not precedential].The Board began by finding that Pittsburgh is a place generally known to the American public. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 1:04 pm
We’re sure many of you are similarly beginning to prepare your materials and get organized as well. [read post]
