Search for: "Kelly v. Kelly"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
A CPLR challenge to a administrative determination is subject to a four-month statute of limitations
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
" In dismissing the member's Article 78 decision the Appellate Division opined that the Retirement System's response to the member's letter in 2017 "did not extend the [Article 78] limitations period" for bringing a timely action.As the Appellate Division held in Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, a request for reconsideration of an administrative determination neither extends nor enlarges the statute of limitation for filing a timely… [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 5:04 pm
On Wednesday, the Houston Chronicle reported some developments in the Odessa, Texas Bible-in-curriculum case, Moreno v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:35 am
The case is better known as the Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:02 pm
In Kelly v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:54 am
Kelly, 40 M.J. 558, 570 (N.M.C.M.R. 1994). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:14 am
” Judge Kelly thought it did, noting that “... the object of the official misconduct statute is to punish a breach of duty committed with the requisite culpable state of mind .... [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:04 pm
Chief Justice Kelly dissented, joined by Justices Cavanagh and Hathaway. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy weighs in on Kelly v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 1:25 pm
(And consistent with California law, the plaintiff should not be permitted to introduce new financial condidtion evidence on remand - - see Kelly v. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
Justice Kelly's dissent: Justice Kelly wrote a well-reasoned dissent. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm
As stated, we also concur with Justice MARY BETH KELLY’s issuance of mandamus. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:25 pm
Friedberg, and Kelly v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Considering the possibility of mitigating of the penalty imposed by the City, termination, the Appellate Division concluded that although Durudogan was a decorated officer, with eighteen years of service, who often received high ratings on department evaluations, he also was previously disciplined for insubordination and placed on one-year dismissal probation.The Appellate Division also noted the ruling in Vecchio v Kelly, 94 AD3d 545, leave to appeal denied 20 NY3d 855, in its… [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:38 am
As we stated in Kelly [Kelly v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:14 pm
Why mention Kelly? [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:51 am
Here are the facts in last week’s 8th District decision in Middleburg Heights v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 7:19 pm
Hearing is delayed until spring at which time the district court rules in the parents’ favor, thus awarding reimbursement for year 1(see N.R. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 12:57 pm
Mark Schoenhofer won in State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
"* In this action the Appellate Division opined that this standard applies where, as here, a police officer has been placed "on dismissal probation in accordance with a negotiated resolution of disciplinary charges", citing Matter of Cipolla v Kelly, 26 AD3d 171. [read post]
