Search for: "Kind v. Superior Court"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2013, 6:19 am
Additional Resources:U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 6:19 am
Additional Resources:U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the first, Vance v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
A jury heard the case in January and February 2011, in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
(Ontario Court of Appeal,TPG Technology Consulting Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:13 pm
The setting was the kind of private meeting generally used in an interrogation or investigation of an employee. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:14 am
Truly, it’s a sticks-and-stones-can-hurt-me kind of world and even the n-word (which you would think EVERYONE knows is offensive) won’t support a HWE claim if it is used only once or twice, depending on the court (e.g., Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, SDAla, March 26, 2013). [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:04 pm
Aren’t the lawyers cleared, and officers of the court? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 2:16 pm
District Court for the District of Massachusetts In Corporate Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:45 am
However, the court found that Parker hadn’t properly pled a violation of the CFA due to regulatory violations; this kind of liability was strict. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:48 pm
The last article about the decision of the Superior Court of Ontario in Envoy Relocation Services Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:02 pm
G.M., the only other Canadian law blog I could find a citation to was a Slaw post by David Cheifetz in an Ontario Superior Court decision. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
Last up, out of the California Court of Appeals, is Fernandez v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 9:39 pm
Superior Court (Brinker), and the case was remanded to the court of appeal to consider in light of the Brinker decision. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
Is it time to dust off your employee handbook? [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
Is it time to dust off your employee handbook? [read post]
