Search for: "Little v State" Results 981 - 1000 of 26,837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In the first issue, the defendant argued that Trooper Bivens had unlawfully prolonged the traffic stop, invoking the Supreme Court’s decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
“I think that the passage of both of these bills, certainly one or the other, or both of them, would be a very strong signal that the United States is not only open for business to do business with this industry and its asset class, but also has a regime in place that makes it highly competitive. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm by Mark Ashton
These are the ones that are supposed to come wrapped in IRS Form 709; the United States Gift Tax Return. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am by Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad
Attorney’s Office in D.C on May 24th, it was revealed that the individuals in question were charged with “conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States” and causing injury to museum property in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Sections 6303(b)(2): Touching of, or Injuries to, Property. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:14 pm
A former linguistics professor at Cal State Fullerton who the university attempted to fire and her spouse. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
Developing artists often have little bargaining power in negotiating terms with their dealers and enforcing those terms through the close of that relationship. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm by Cory Carlson
" Simply stated, The Common Law is a system of law centered around precedent. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am by Jacob Wirz
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:01 pm by NARF
(State Guardianship Order; Tribal Court Standing) Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal Council v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am by Sasha Volokh
The Supreme Court had little trouble determining that the statute was content-based, even though the legislature had no desire to suppress particular ideas: "The Son of Sam law . . . singles out income derived from expressive activity for a burden the State places on no other income, and it is directed only at works with a specified content. [read post]