Search for: "MATTER OF H C R"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
(h) The BoA’s written decision was not reasoned with respect to the auxiliary requests.The EBA found the petition not to be clearly inadmissible and then dealt with its allowability:[4] The EBA will consider […] each of the alleged procedural violations (a), (c) to (f) and (h) […] and then consider the general argument relating to all the alleged violations (c) to (h). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
R (on the application of HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, R (on the application of PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa, BH (AP) and another v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland), KAS or H (AP) v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland) and Genoa Filipek-Kwasny v Polish Judicial Authority, heard 5 – 8 March 2012. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:00 pm
Y (Case C-71/11). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
In the Matter of S (a child), heard 20 February 2012. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:38 am
R. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:41 am
is a member in good standing of a recognized legal profession in the foreign jurisdiction, the members of which are admitted to practice as lawyers or counselors at law or the equivalent, and are subject to effective regulation and discipline by a duly constituted professional body or a public authority; c. submits within [60] days of first providing legal services in this jurisdiction a complete application for admission to practice as a foreign legal… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:30 pm
Update: We have prepared PDF and ePub versions of this report for download. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:17 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:33 am
Chairman Richard C. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
(c) In respect of appeals filed after this date, however, the position has been changed by the amendments to the RPBA which then came into force. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:13 am
H. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Professional representatives are subject to the disciplinary power exercised by the Institute of Professional Representatives (epi) or the EPO (A 134a(1)(c)) whereas the disciplinary power to which legal practitioners are subject is a matter of national law and is exercised by national organisations or offices. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
In the matter of Peacock, heard 14 December 2011. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
A friend — a civil law attorney — contacted me the other day to tell me that she was referring someone over. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
But there is no constitutional right to R-E-S-P-E-C-T, as Aretha might put it. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
C. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:18 am
§ 1956(h). [read post]
