Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 981 - 1000 of 13,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2011, 5:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s probably true that they would have bought other contact lens solution had they not bought MoisturePlus, but that doesn’t mean they didn’t suffer economic harm. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[t]he reasoning in both the George and White cases is applicable”), aff’d, 44 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. 1995); In re TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation, 872 F. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:37 am
Cox, 342 F. 2d 167 (5th Cir. 1965). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Jason Rantanen
First, unlike changing the law or its application which requires all to adjust, only applicants dissatisfied with the status quo would see a change. 85% of office actions don’t even include a PSM rejection I’ve found previously. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 5:08 am
"Of course we should be working, in general, to put everything closer together so nobody has to get behind the wheel at the age of 95 — or 55, for that matter. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 9:02 am by Greg Mersol
Chrysler Corp., 150 F.3d 1011, 1020 (9th Cir. 1998), and therefore can’t be trusted to adequately represent the interests of the proposed class. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm by Michael O'Hear
Bell, 624 F.3d 803 (7th Cir. 2010), the Seventh Circuit held that the FSA does not apply retroactively to cases in which an appeal was pending on August 3. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 5:00 pm
“You better f-----g reply to me or I will f-----g kill you,” according to The Washington Post. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
What matters is the consumer’s degree of care exercised at the time of purchase. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:31 am by Richard Hunt
 Velez mentions this standard, but doesn’t decide one way or the other whether it applies. [read post]
29 May 2017, 7:04 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
As our Fort Lauderdale personal injury attorneys can explain, it generally doesn’t matter if criminal charges have not been filed in connection with an accident in which someone was injured. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:23 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
[T]he reach of the Federal Circuit's section 1338 reasoning is uncabined, and can potentially sweep any state law case that touches on substantive patent law (or, for that matter, the other areas of law covered by section 1338, such as copyright and trademarks) irrevocably into federal court. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
InvestPic, LLC, 898 F.3d 1161, 1163 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 10:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
’”); Invitrogen, 424 F.3d at 1381 (“[T]hiscourt has determined that a use before the critical periodwas not public even without an express agreement ofconfidentiality. [read post]