Search for: "NIXON v. STATE"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am
If Collins’s effort is successful and Schiff gets his way, Bolton has publicly stated that he will comply with a Senate subpoena for his testimony despite the White House’s claim that he is absolutely immune from such testimony. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:33 am
And as a legal matter, Brown v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
The analysis is lengthy, so I will state my main conclusions here: None of the critics defends the report’s actual reasoning, which is pretty obviously flawed. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Though the committee cites the Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:49 am
What’s more, the Supreme Court gutted Congress’s ability to veto presidential actions under IEEPA with its 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court observed in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:27 am
There are obvious parallels with the famous “Pentagon Papers” case, New York Times v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm
Nevertheless, state criminal remedies remain legally available and theoretically unimpaired. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:43 pm
Curiously, the statute says nothing at all about civil immunity under Nixon v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Canada In the case of Huff v Zuk, 2019 ABQB 691 K D Nixon J awarded the plaintiff defamation damages of $50,000 in action between two dentists. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:04 am
 In January, for instance, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
Burns, 427 U.S. 347(1976) and Branti v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:35 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
The case exemplifying this is United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
