Search for: "People v. Lewis" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar Professor of Law and International Affairs Acting University Ombudsperson (from October 2021) University Ombudsperson Elect Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802    1.814.863.3640 (direct) ||  lcb11@psu.edu     I appreciate the turnout for an event that by its title would no longer create the buzz and excitement that it might have in the 17thcentury, much less the 13th. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 2:35 pm
"We conclude that there does exist a sufficient link," noting that in Loving v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm by ALeonard
Jackson, Chief Justice Earl Warren, Justice Byron White, Justice Arthur Goldberg, Justice Abe Fortas, Justice Lewis F. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
Lewis & Clark were legendary explorers and discovers. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm by Rosalind Early
” “Most academic connections are developed along the lines of narrowly defined intellectual interests,” said James V. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" Vice Chancellor Donald Parsons, Jr.: "Delaware decisions like Caremark and Stone v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Barbara Pfeffer Billauer
By Barbara Pfeffer Billauer Approaches to resolving scientific evidentiary issues continue to diverge throughout the country.[1] A prominent recent example includes the rejection of the medical diagnosis of Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) to reflect disparate views in the scientific, medical, and legal communities. [read post]