Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 981 - 1000
of 25,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2023, 4:39 pm
Richardson found that the Maryland law fails the tw0-part Bruen test from the 2021 US Supreme Court case New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 3:48 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 10:47 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
Sure, many people have come and gone from Dilworth Paxson before me over the years. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm
In Robert Young v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 11:39 pm
[All of our coverage of the Oatmeal v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 10:20 am
[Post by Venkat] People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:03 am
Cariou v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:07 am
California v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
The Court of Appeal affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further consideration. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:19 am
Accordingly, we might say Article V, in theory, supports the view that here the people rule, while in fact orchestrating a significantly different story. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those… [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
As Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Texas to U.S. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
In Mason v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
Joe Touro, Annenberg School: heard rumors that Google is starting to desilo its data: Gmail v. contextual marketing etc. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 9:33 am
Healthmate Int’l, LLC v. [read post]