Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 981 - 1000
of 178,327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2024, 4:00 pm
: Congress's attempt to codify Chevron deference is calling Roberts's bluff. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 3:45 pm
Emboldened by the administrations’ move, hundreds of plaintiffs have sued PFAS manufacturers, alleging that the companies contaminated their water and soil. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 3:10 pm
The majority's burst of common sense was short-lived, however, because its opinion also says that no person would conclude that a restaurant's use of the word "boneless" on a menu was the equivalent of the restaurant's "warranting the absence of bones. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 3:03 pm
The reform seeks to rectify this by mitigating information disparities between parties and enhancing the appeal of KapMuG proceedings from the plaintiff’s standpoint. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:20 pm
Apr. 23, 2024) Plaintiffs alleged that the presence of per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (“PFAS”) in Kerrygold butter made the use of “pure Irish butter” into false advertising under NY law. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm
” The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) claim, arguing in pertinent part that a class action was not necessary to vindicate the plaintiffs’ interests and, in any event, that the leases contained class action waivers that were valid and enforceable. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm
” The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) claim, arguing in pertinent part that a class action was not necessary to vindicate the plaintiffs’ interests and, in any event, that the leases contained class action waivers that were valid and enforceable. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm
” The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) claim, arguing in pertinent part that a class action was not necessary to vindicate the plaintiffs’ interests and, in any event, that the leases contained class action waivers that were valid and enforceable. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm
Puzzlingly, the court did find state law dilution plausibly pled because plaintiffs alleged that “Venkateswaran acted with hostility to Sundaresan’s and Portkey’s marks” and thus had predatory intent. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:12 pm
In response to Plaintiff’s Complaint, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss alleging that Plaintiff lacked standing and failed to state a claim. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 10:47 am
The plaintiff's suit is like if RBG's answer was 'When there are 11.' The post Suit Alleges Anti-White Bias In Tax Law Hiring Despite Virtually All Tax Lawyers Being White appeared first on Above the Law. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:59 am
Plaintiff says he's owed $50,000 in overtime wages. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 7:16 am
Blog post recapping the Preliminary Injunction Hearing Against Florida’s Social Media Censorship Law Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief to Florida’s Opposition. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:53 am
This could lead to a reduction in the plaintiff’s awarded compensation. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:30 am
That is, revelations about the plaintiff’s misconduct arose during the same two-month period. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
Here plaintiff's employment was terminated for inappropriate touching of female students. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 3:56 am
Once he was blocked, Plaintiff could no longer view, reply to, or retweet any of @UOEquity’s posts…. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:34 am
In the period between the end of the waiting period and the insurer’s incapacity decision there occurred a policy anniversary which increased the cover by $107 064.80 which the court found the insured was entitled to receive.The construction of the policy was such that a claim under the own occupation temporary disability cover required the establishment of the following: That the plaintiff had suffered a sickness or injury while working in regular employment for income; … [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
The court found that, even if the Plaintiff’s alleged facts supported reasonable inferences that the Board had known about and failed to respond to the Company’s compliance problems, no facts were alleged that supported an inference that the Board failed to respond in bad faith. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 8:26 pm
As the court explained, it was clear that the plaintiffs had not received a final decision regarding the revocation of their permit since they conceded in their complaint that their appeal from the building inspector’s decision remained pending before the town’s zoning board of appeals. [read post]
