Search for: "SMITH et al. v. SMITH et al."
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,018
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
” I suspect that reform may be kicked into the long grass tonight by the Tory rebels et al – not a matter over which I shall lose much sleep given the rather more pressing problems facing the country at the moment which require mature political thought and action. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit margins were so… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Trial2006-03-27 Judd v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
In Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
Rehana Ahmed-Saucedo, Sonal Singh, and Feng Liu-Smith. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
§ 1125(a)) Relief for Unfair Competition Under California Business And Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
In 2001, the case of Golan et al v Holder was brought by a collection of plaintiffs, including orchestra conductors, educators, performers, motion picture distributors and publishers against the United States government alleging that Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA)- section 104A and 109 of the Copyright Act - is unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
Only in 1983 did the General Assembly amend Section 401(a) to add the 90-days-before-filing alternative (see Section 401(a), Supplement to Historical and Practice Notes, Ill.Ann.Stat. ch. 40, ¶ 401 (Smith-Hurd 1985 pocket part)). [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm
As we discussed in our post on NFA annual compliance obligations, commodity pool operators will need to submit annual audited reports to the NFA by March 31 of this year. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
” Appellants [Judith Miller et al.] argue that “this proposition of law is flatly contrary to the great weight of authority in this and other circuits. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
The Hill: “Businesses have a responsibility, too,” said Obama in his weekly address on Saturday. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
READ BELOW FOR THE WHOLE DECISION 2011 WL 2612835Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115, restricts citation of unpublished opinions in California courts.Court of Appeal, Fifth District, California.Mark DEMUCHA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE INC., Defendant and Respondent.No. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
Back in 2001, in the aftermath of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, I participated in a Federal Judicial Center (FJC) television production of “Science in the Courtroom, program 6” (2001). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Complaint ¶ 1, Alianza Americas v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
