Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 981 - 1000
of 6,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2017, 12:00 pm
In the case, East Texas Copy Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In Part 3, we discussed the impact of the Final Rule on noncompetition covenants entered into by sellers of a business, as well as the application of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 280G golden parachute rules to noncompete covenants affected by the Final Rule. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:31 am
Since the COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020, there has been a higher proportion of M&A deals including earnouts—used, as usual, to bridge gaps in buyers’ and sellers’ views of valuation in light of economic and financial uncertainties in the marketplace generally and with respect to specific businesses. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 1:31 pm
In Marx v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:26 pm
The ruling comes in the case of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:58 pm
Arista Records, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 2:03 pm
The case is Investec Bank v Lombard Insurance Company Ltd & Esor Uitvlugt (Pty) Ltd. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:41 pm
Prior to the petitioners purchasing the home, the sellers removed a wall and converted the home back to a duplex. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:55 am
A buyer entered into an offer to purchase lake front property from a seller with a condition that the lot perk for a three bedroom house. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:31 am
Since the COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020, there has been a higher proportion of M&A deals including earnouts—used, as usual, to bridge gaps in buyers’ and sellers’ views of valuation in light of economic and financial uncertainties in the marketplace generally and with respect to specific businesses. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:05 am
The Ninth Circuit recently tackled this issue in AK Futures LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:49 am
(Lemelson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
The line of cases, from Revlon and Paramount v. [read post]
