Search for: "State v. Burns" Results 981 - 1000 of 3,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Sarah Seo argues that Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Div. 1960), where plaintiff was burned as a result of the improper administration of an anesthetic during childbirth, Nowacki v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:11 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Div. 1960), where plaintiff was burned as a result of the improper administration of an anesthetic during childbirth, Nowacki v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:41 pm
Unlike other states where showing a high level of control by the parent over the subsidiary is sufficient, Maryland is more restrictive; the corporate entity will only be disregarded when it is "necessary to prevent fraud or to enforce a paramount equity. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:45 am
Commonwealth v Hector Rengifo, N. 15-1779, August 5, 2016               This case answers the burning question, “When does a Pennsylvania time served to twelve month sentence equal of sentence of almost two and one-half years for the purposes of the U.S.S.G.? [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
While the question of sale of sex toys does not loom large as an issue of burning national importance for the Supreme Court to address, a circuit split over the meaning of Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
But these strange procedural events only add fuel to the fire burning in the lower state and federal courts. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
He did not disclose the inventions to anyone in the United States before he applied for United States patents. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:06 am
-based private equity firm, and arranged for Thayer to pay DiBella a percentage of the investment, though he did not do work to justify the payment (SEC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Rick Hasen, who at his Election Law Blog contends that “the Court strongly suggested in the 1966 Burns v. [read post]