Search for: "State v. Cornell"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2018, 12:30 pm
Their concerns are to a large extent shared by Michael Dorf of Cornell. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These state owned enterprises (SOEs) operate where state duty and enterprise responsibility meet. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
He also relies on United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
” In a case that came before the highest court in New York State in 1984, People v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:53 am
Wade (or, to be more pedantic, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 8:06 am
The State also relies on State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court evaluated sobriety checkpoints (at which everyone must stop and submit to observation and answer some questions) under the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures, Justice Stevens, in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in PGA Tour v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am
Oct. 21, 2020): “because the infringing act of downloading the material occurred on a computer outside the United States, there was no act in the United States to establish jurisdiction” * Donat v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
Jared Ham and Amanda Wong did the same for Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:02 pm
In Cruzan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:01 am
Perhaps the most important such case was West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
& Life Sciences at Cornell Univ., 4 NY3d 225).As the Court of Appeals said in Beechwood Restorative Care Ctr. v Signor, 5 NY3d 435, "An agency's records are presumptively open to public inspection, without regard to need or purpose of the applicant" and "FOIL is to be liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:34 pm
In Kirtsaeng, a foreign student attending Cornell, on learning that Wiley’s copyrighted textbooks were much more expensive to buy in the United States than at home, began importing textbooks from home to be sold domestically at huge profits. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
The lone Bruen cite to professor Cornell's private source was simply part of a refutation of an argument made by professor Cornell and the dissent. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
Under Miranda v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am
Saul Cornell, Justin Florence, and Matthew Shors have a piece in Slate explaining that localities have exercised a long-standing authority to regulate guns. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Yafai v. [read post]