Search for: "State v. Henderson" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved complaints include: Mrs Lorna Leckie v The Scottish Sun, Mr Andrew Curtis v The Sun, Dr Kalind Parashar v Daily Mail and Councillor James Moher v Brent & Kilburn Times. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm by Lisa McElroy
The Court did decide one case this week, United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
The second touches on the nature of the rights of individuals and is rooted in international law (and sometimes domestic constitutional law) defining the scope of the human rights of individuals and the consequential obligations of states and legal persons. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:58 am by Adam Wagner
Petsafe Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Welsh Ministers [2010] EWHC 2908 (Admin) (16 November 2010): Do pets have human rights? [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 8:23 am
HarbourtOn June 8, 2007, a three judge panel of the District of Columbia Court of Appeal issued a decision in NRDC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:44 am by Mike Scarcella
" Judges Douglas Ginsburg and Karen LeCraft Henderson, the panel majority, noted that the Supreme Court ruling in D.C. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
As the review states, the decision is that the offer is suitable now and at the time she returns to work. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
As the review states, the decision is that the offer is suitable now and at the time she returns to work. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:23 am by Rosalind English
 In Sahin v Turkey (2007) 44 EHRR 5 the Court assumed that the applicant? [read post]