Search for: "State v. Mart" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm by The Complex Litigator
Chinese Daily News, Inc. took its latest turn today, when the Ninth Circuit, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, issued the most decision in Wang v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:40 am by JakeMcGowan
Against everyone except Amazon and Wal-mart, Masck also included unfair competition claims under Lanham Act §1125 and Michigan state law. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 3:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
After receiving three separate petitions for review, including petitions from real parties Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and the City of Sonora, the California Supreme Court voted unanimously on February 13, 2013 to grant review of the Fifth District’s controversial decision in Tuolomne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:48 am by Jeffrey Vlasek
  Second, the court’s analysis seems to downplay differences between the standards for certification under section 16(b) of the FLSA and Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, thus inviting more arguments based on the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:27 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  In doing so, Espenschied  brings the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:07 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Through the writ of mandamus, HCR sought to vacate the nationwide conditional certification and interrupt the delivery of notice to a sampling of employees across the country, relying on Wal-mart, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:59 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Larry Catá Backer,  Case Note: Rights And Accountability In Development (Raid) V Das Air (21
July 2008) And Global Witness V Afrimex (28 August 2008); Small Steps Toward an Autonomous Transnational Legal System for the Regulation of Multinational Corporations, Melbourne Journal of International Law 10(1):258-307 (2009). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
George King of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order in Pedroza v. [read post]