Search for: "State v. Sales" Results 981 - 1000 of 20,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm by Keith L. Miller
The Court of Appeals of the Seventh Circuit of the state of Illinois has affirmed a judgment in Estate of Stanley Cora v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:39 am by Joy Waltemath
Consequently, his state law wage claim also failed as a matter of law (Lawson v. [read post]
Thereafter, the statute requires the President to impose a number of sanctions relating to (i) foreign assistance, (ii) arms sales, (iii) arms sales financing, (iv) denial of U.S. credit assistance (e.g., Export-Import Bank loans) and (v) a prohibition on exports of any controlled goods. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:16 pm by Daniel K. McClendon
Wayfair, a case that could substantially reshape the state sales tax landscape. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:15 am by Eric
On the trademark front, we've discussed how manufacturers are battling back against unwanted eBay sales (see Mary Kay v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:41 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The test is the result of 25-year-old Supreme Court ruling in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:16 am by Joy Waltemath
A bonus plan providing for specific payouts when sales employees reached stated objectives constituted a definite offer, and an employee’s continued employment and efforts to meet sales targets was valid consideration upholding a unilateral contract, determined the Sixth Circuit in an unpublished opinion. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 8:38 am by Kevin Kaufman
Forty-five states impose statewide sales taxes, and in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:36 am by My name
An example of a recent case in which a Texas federal judge dealt a blow to a developer by allowing a group of salespersons to proceed together as a class is Edwards v. [read post]
10 Feb 2006, 9:25 am
The 10th Circuit recently issued an opinion in an interesting case involving issues of (1) unauthorized sales of genuine products and (2) use of the trademark holder's mark on the Internet in various ways.In Australian Gold, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:18 pm
Another interesting objection to the Chrysler sale motion comes from the State of Connecticut. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am by James Nurton
The judgment in Case C172/18 AMS Neve Ltd, Barnett Waddingham Trustees, Mark Crabtree v Heritage Audio SL, Pedro Rodríguez Arribas addresses questions concerning jurisdiction, in particular in cases involving Internet sales. [read post]