Search for: "Superior Bank"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 9:10 am
The California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:27 pm
Bank of Ma. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 7:19 am
Superior Court, the bank loaned $1.5 million in exchange for two notes, each secured by separate deeds of trust on the same property in Santa Clara County. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:32 am
In New York, the creditor must show that her “rights to the property are superior to those of the transferee” defendant. [read post]
29 May 2011, 8:00 pm
Luckily for employers, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has confirmed — in its decision in Jones v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm
Superior Court of Orange County (1992) 9 Cal App.4th 162, and McIndoe v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:44 pm
Superior Court and Martinez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:48 am
The court was wrestling with the question of whether Neilson had claimed a patentable manufacture, or the abstract principle that hot air was superior to cold. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:00 am
Superior Court (1997) 16 Cal.4th 1101, 1107.) [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm
LaSalle on market bidding as superior to judicial valuation, and thus bodes ill for the debtor here. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
Toronto Dominion Bank (1997), 147 D.L.R. (4th) 128 (Ont. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:16 am
O Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) foi o último tribunal do país a cobrar custas processuais – taxas judiciárias devidas pela prestação de serviços públicos de natureza forense – para o ajuizamento de uma ação ou a interposição de um recurso. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:16 am
O Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) foi o último tribunal do país a cobrar custas processuais – taxas judiciárias devidas pela prestação de serviços públicos de natureza forense – para o ajuizamento de uma ação ou a interposição de um recurso. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:00 pm
Concepcion disapproved the "Discover Bank rule," stating: "In Discover Bank, the California Supreme Court applied [the doctrine of unconscionability] to class-action waivers in arbitration agreements and held as follows: [¶] '[W]hen the [class action] waiver is found in a consumer contract of adhesion in a setting in which disputes between the contracting parties predictably involve small amounts of damages, and when it is alleged that the party with the… [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Concepcion disapproved the “Discover Bank rule,” stating: “In Discover Bank, the California Supreme Court applied [the doctrine of unconscionability] to class-action waivers in arbitration agreements and held as follows: [¶] ‘[W]hen the [class action] waiver is found in a consumer contract of adhesion in a setting in which disputes between the contracting parties predictably involve small amounts of damages, and when it is… [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:44 pm
Under a judgment approved by Wake County Superior Court Judge G. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:01 am
Continental Bank et al., the defendant (“the Bank”) retained the services of the plaintiff (“Tetra”), a consulting firm owned by Mr. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:51 am
Superior Court, which named one Ben S. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:33 pm
Thus, since the mortgage existed prior to McIntyre’s work and McIntyre would have expected it to be superior, there was no prejudice and equitable subrogation applied. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:28 pm
Superior Court of Cal., 436 U.S. 84, 92 (1978). [read post]
